<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>John D. Head | Comments</title><description>CONSULTANT | RAINMAKER | INTEGRATION EXPERT</description><link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 4 Mar 2010 03:34:12 PM -0500</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Iron Maiden Summer 2010 Tour - Supported by Dream Theater</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Mar 2010 03:34:12 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Erik Brooks</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Iron Maiden Summer 2010 Tour - Supported by Dream Theater</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[HOLY.<br /><br />CRAP.<br /><br />Dude, thanks again for the heads-up with the Maiden gigs. Dream Theater too? COUNT ME IN!<br /><br />UP THE IRONS! \m/]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[HOLY.<br /><br />CRAP.<br /><br />Dude, thanks again for the heads-up with the Maiden gigs. Dream Theater too? COUNT ME IN!<br /><br />UP THE IRONS! \m/]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/iron-maiden-summer-2010-tour-supported-by-dream-theater?opendocument&amp;comments#03042010033412PMPSCTAX.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Welcome to the updated JohnDavidHead.com</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:00:20 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Patrick Kwinten</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Welcome to the updated JohnDavidHead.com</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[printer friendly too!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[printer friendly too!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/welcome-to-the-updated-johndavidhead.com?opendocument&amp;comments#25022010150020PSCSMT.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Welcome to the updated JohnDavidHead.com</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:28:55 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alan Lepofsky</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Welcome to the updated JohnDavidHead.com</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Looks nice John. The link blue links on the right on top of the grey are a little hard to see, but no biggie.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looks nice John. The link blue links on the right on top of the grey are a little hard to see, but no biggie.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/welcome-to-the-updated-johndavidhead.com?opendocument&amp;comments#02252010112855AMPSCNHR.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Welcome to the updated JohnDavidHead.com</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:16:44 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Chris Blatnick</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Welcome to the updated JohnDavidHead.com</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Test]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Test]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/welcome-to-the-updated-johndavidhead.com?opendocument&amp;comments#02252010111644AMPSCN9Z.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Social Media Makover - Slides and Wrap Up</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:15:06 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>john test</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Social Media Makover - Slides and Wrap Up</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[this is a comment test]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[this is a comment test]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/social-media-makover-slides-and-wrap-up?opendocument&amp;comments#02252010111506AMPSCN8Z.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Welcome to the updated JohnDavidHead.com</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:13:28 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Chris Blatnick </dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Welcome to the updated JohnDavidHead.com</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Looks great, John! Congratulations on the new direction. I look forward to being a continued reader.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looks great, John! Congratulations on the new direction. I look forward to being a continued reader.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/welcome-to-the-updated-johndavidhead.com?opendocument&amp;comments#02252010111328AMPSCN7Y.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Today is Paczki Day!</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:51:17 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Michal Swietek</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Today is Paczki Day!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[more info about "Ostatki" and "Fat Thursday" :)<br /><br />{ <a href="http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostatki" target="_blank" title="Link: pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostatki">Link</a> }<br /><br />{ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_Thursday" target="_blank" title="Link: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_Thursday">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[more info about "Ostatki" and "Fat Thursday" :)<br /><br />{ <a href="http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostatki" target="_blank" title="Link: pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostatki">Link</a> }<br /><br />{ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_Thursday" target="_blank" title="Link: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_Thursday">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/today-is-paczki-day?opendocument&amp;comments#02162010045117PMPSCUT4.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>It&#8217;s time Microsoft decide how serious they are about real people using OOXML</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:37:18 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ben Langhinrichs</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>It&#8217;s time Microsoft decide how serious they are about real people using OOXML</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[It is sad to watch all this play out, but hardly unexpected. Microsoft was intent enough on "winning" the OOXML standardization, but they have shown very lackluster enthusiasm for making it more than a nominal standard.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is sad to watch all this play out, but hardly unexpected. Microsoft was intent enough on "winning" the OOXML standardization, but they have shown very lackluster enthusiasm for making it more than a nominal standard.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/its-time-microsoft-decide-how-serious-they-are-about-real-people-using-ooxml?opendocument&amp;comments#02162010023718PMPSCS7D.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>It&#8217;s time Microsoft decide how serious they are about real people using OOXML</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:59:53 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rob Weir</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>It&#8217;s time Microsoft decide how serious they are about real people using OOXML</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Office is comprised of 3 different apps from 3 different teams, and absent any opposing force they will follow the dictum of "architecture follows organization" and diverge in the ways you observe. Painful for the user, but very predictable.<br /><br />I did a post on this a few years ago with some illustrative examples of OOXML and ODF markup showing the kinds of problems in this area:<br /><br />{ <a href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/03/disharmony-of-ooxml.html" target="_blank" title="Link: www.robweir.com/blog/2008/03/disharmony-of-ooxml.html">Link</a> }<br /><br />It is probably too late to fix this in the markup. The whole "billions of legacy documents" thing. But it should be possible for Microsoft to clean this up at the tooling level. There is no reason why their document processing API's cannot (at a sufficiently high level) paper over the syntactic differences.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Office is comprised of 3 different apps from 3 different teams, and absent any opposing force they will follow the dictum of "architecture follows organization" and diverge in the ways you observe. Painful for the user, but very predictable.<br /><br />I did a post on this a few years ago with some illustrative examples of OOXML and ODF markup showing the kinds of problems in this area:<br /><br />{ <a href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/03/disharmony-of-ooxml.html" target="_blank" title="Link: www.robweir.com/blog/2008/03/disharmony-of-ooxml.html">Link</a> }<br /><br />It is probably too late to fix this in the markup. The whole "billions of legacy documents" thing. But it should be possible for Microsoft to clean this up at the tooling level. There is no reason why their document processing API's cannot (at a sufficiently high level) paper over the syntactic differences.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/its-time-microsoft-decide-how-serious-they-are-about-real-people-using-ooxml?opendocument&amp;comments#02162010015953PMPSCRG2.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Today is Paczki Day!</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:17:23 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Adam Gartenberg</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Today is Paczki Day!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Yes, it is definitely still big in Detroit (although I think the press plays it up because a) they like saying "Punch-key"* and b) they got to 'report' all morning from inside a bakery instead of a crime scene or along a highway somewhere like every other day.<br /><br />And it is definitely *not* a thing down here in Raleigh, North Carolina :)<br /><br />(*I want to say they pronounced it more like "pahtch-key" than "punch-key" in Detroit, but could just be misremembering it.)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, it is definitely still big in Detroit (although I think the press plays it up because a) they like saying "Punch-key"* and b) they got to 'report' all morning from inside a bakery instead of a crime scene or along a highway somewhere like every other day.<br /><br />And it is definitely *not* a thing down here in Raleigh, North Carolina :)<br /><br />(*I want to say they pronounced it more like "pahtch-key" than "punch-key" in Detroit, but could just be misremembering it.)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/today-is-paczki-day?opendocument&amp;comments#02162010011723PMPSCQME.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>IBM Lotus Symphony Website gets a makeover</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:30:04 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Erik Brooks</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM Lotus Symphony Website gets a makeover</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Looks good. Too bad clicking "download" still whisks you off into the ugly world of yuck (and that's before you have to register for an IBM.com ID.) But it's a nice-looking intro page.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looks good. Too bad clicking "download" still whisks you off into the ugly world of yuck (and that's before you have to register for an IBM.com ID.) But it's a nice-looking intro page.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/ibm-lotus-symphony-website-gets-a-makeover?opendocument&amp;comments#02042010073004AMPSCHUC.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2010 : Lotus Symphony Development - Comparing UNO vs LotusScript</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:46:04 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John Head</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2010 : Lotus Symphony Development - Comparing UNO vs LotusScript</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[It is not part of Lotus Symphony and frankly, it's a feature that they shouldn't. Server Side version of OpenOffice.org is very limiting and you are better off working directly with the odf or ooxml format. Hopefully IBM will get off their ass and get us a usable ODF toolkit in the near future]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is not part of Lotus Symphony and frankly, it's a feature that they shouldn't. Server Side version of OpenOffice.org is very limiting and you are better off working directly with the odf or ooxml format. Hopefully IBM will get off their ass and get us a usable ODF toolkit in the near future]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2010-lotus-symphony-development-comparing-uno-vs-lotusscript?opendocument&amp;comments#02022010084604AMJHEKBV.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2010 : Lotus Symphony Development - Comparing UNO vs LotusScript</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2010 03:39:20 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Miguel Angel Calvo</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2010 : Lotus Symphony Development - Comparing UNO vs LotusScript</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi John,<br /><br />We've got a nice API and integrating with Symphony is going to be really easy. But, can Symphony be used as a server as Open Office ? I have been unable to find any information about that.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi John,<br /><br />We've got a nice API and integrating with Symphony is going to be really easy. But, can Symphony be used as a server as Open Office ? I have been unable to find any information about that.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2010-lotus-symphony-development-comparing-uno-vs-lotusscript?opendocument&amp;comments#01022010153920PSCTE6.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2010 : More Details about Lotus Symphony 3.0</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:23:25 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>nJohn Head</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2010 : More Details about Lotus Symphony 3.0</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Not sure but will ask - but I have not had any excel 2007 with huge number of rows not open in Symphony 1.3]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not sure but will ask - but I have not had any excel 2007 with huge number of rows not open in Symphony 1.3]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2010-more-details-about-lotus-symphony-3.0?opendocument&amp;comments#02012010112325AMJHENE8.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2010 : More Details about Lotus Symphony 3.0</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:22:32 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John Head</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2010 : More Details about Lotus Symphony 3.0</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[They only work in embedded mode today. I know the plan is to do something, but not sure when ti will hit]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They only work in embedded mode today. I know the plan is to do something, but not sure when ti will hit]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2010-more-details-about-lotus-symphony-3.0?opendocument&amp;comments#02012010112232AMJHENDP.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2010 : More Details about Lotus Symphony 3.0</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:50:46 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Roy Rumaner</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2010 : More Details about Lotus Symphony 3.0</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[John do you know the max number of rows allowed in Spreadsheet?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[John do you know the max number of rows allowed in Spreadsheet?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2010-more-details-about-lotus-symphony-3.0?opendocument&amp;comments#02012010105046AMPSCMRY.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2010 : More Details about Lotus Symphony 3.0</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:29:13 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kathy Brown</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2010 : More Details about Lotus Symphony 3.0</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[John - wondering if you know...I *thought* I heard that the LS APIs will work with the standalone. Currently it only works with the embedded. Just wondering if you heard this, too.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[John - wondering if you know...I *thought* I heard that the LS APIs will work with the standalone. Currently it only works with the embedded. Just wondering if you heard this, too.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2010-more-details-about-lotus-symphony-3.0?opendocument&amp;comments#02012010102913AMPSCMCB.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Time for another review ... IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5.1</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 04:30:26 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Duffbert</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Time for another review ... IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5.1</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Nice review, John... honest and open.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nice review, John... honest and open.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/time-for-another-review-...-ibm-lotus-notes-and-domino-8.5.1?opendocument&amp;comments#01312010043026PMPSCUE3.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2010 : Lotus is taking the lead in HTML5 and other technologies</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:34:52 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ben Langhinrichs</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2010 : Lotus is taking the lead in HTML5 and other technologies</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[John,<br /><br />For what it is worth, I agree that the chances of IBM "integraating Midas" are exactly zero. That ship has indeed sailed. On the other hand, the idea that IBM is even moving closer to HTML content or native ODF content is laughable. I heard the same thing (though it used to be described as HTML or XML) in 2000, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2009, and here it is 2010, I'm still hearing it. Any actual signs of that change? The closest they have come is that XPage design uses XML for part of its design element. Nothing I saw at Lotusphere, have heard online or have heard from any IBMers has indicated a strong move toward changing internal formats. A small move toward MIME is happening with the web based rich text editor, but even that converts back and forth to rich text for any use in the client or most programming. Like it or not, IBM will still be dealing with rich text for at least the next two to three major versions.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[John,<br /><br />For what it is worth, I agree that the chances of IBM "integraating Midas" are exactly zero. That ship has indeed sailed. On the other hand, the idea that IBM is even moving closer to HTML content or native ODF content is laughable. I heard the same thing (though it used to be described as HTML or XML) in 2000, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2009, and here it is 2010, I'm still hearing it. Any actual signs of that change? The closest they have come is that XPage design uses XML for part of its design element. Nothing I saw at Lotusphere, have heard online or have heard from any IBMers has indicated a strong move toward changing internal formats. A small move toward MIME is happening with the web based rich text editor, but even that converts back and forth to rich text for any use in the client or most programming. Like it or not, IBM will still be dealing with rich text for at least the next two to three major versions.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2010-lotus-is-taking-the-lead-in-html5-and-other-technologies?opendocument&amp;comments#01262010063452AMPSCGRW.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2010 : IBM Project Vulcan and thoughts I have not read elsewhere</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:46:53 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bill Dorge</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2010 : IBM Project Vulcan and thoughts I have not read elsewhere</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Let me explain my point, visions and directions are subject to change or could just disappear after a few months or years. Remember SAA, on-Demand, SOA, and Microsoft had their share also, I could go on for days probably. In the end we just refocus and get a new vision. <br /><br />I'm glad the customers at Lotusphere were happy to see this direction, but I wouldn't expect them to say anything else, preaching to the choir. What happens when you take this message to a non-Lotus customer, or even a Lotus cusomter that doesn't attend Lotusphere, and start talking about a vision that's going to evolve over the next 5 years. Except for KC and a few clients in St. Louis, most of my customers are in the out lying areas of Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma, most of them would call that pitch fertilizer(or your favoite adjective).<br /><br />Don't get me wrong, I giggled and thought pretty much the same when I saw the video of Ray giving his pitch, it always appeals to the faithful in the crowd, that's why they are there. I'm just saying as someone who was looking in from the outside this time, my yellow glasses were a little fogged up.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Let me explain my point, visions and directions are subject to change or could just disappear after a few months or years. Remember SAA, on-Demand, SOA, and Microsoft had their share also, I could go on for days probably. In the end we just refocus and get a new vision. <br /><br />I'm glad the customers at Lotusphere were happy to see this direction, but I wouldn't expect them to say anything else, preaching to the choir. What happens when you take this message to a non-Lotus customer, or even a Lotus cusomter that doesn't attend Lotusphere, and start talking about a vision that's going to evolve over the next 5 years. Except for KC and a few clients in St. Louis, most of my customers are in the out lying areas of Missouri, Kansas, and Oklahoma, most of them would call that pitch fertilizer(or your favoite adjective).<br /><br />Don't get me wrong, I giggled and thought pretty much the same when I saw the video of Ray giving his pitch, it always appeals to the faithful in the crowd, that's why they are there. I'm just saying as someone who was looking in from the outside this time, my yellow glasses were a little fogged up.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.johndavidhead.com/jhead/johnhead.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2010-ibm-project-vulcan-and-thoughts-i-have-not-read-elsewhere?opendocument&amp;comments#01252010014653PMPSCR7U.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>
